NFL discloses findings of investigation into Saints’ violations of ‘Bounty Rule’ – UPDATED

New Orleans Saints defensive coordinator Gregg Williams, left, talks with linebacker Jonathan Vilma during first half action at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans, Louisiana, January 2, 2011. UPI/A.J. Sisco

Late Friday afternoon, the NFL dropped a bombshell, saying the league had investigated violations of the NFL’s ‘bounty rule” by the New Orleans Saints dating back to the 2009 season.

The NFL’s security department reviewed 18,000 documents totaling 50,000 pages, and it disclosed that between 22 and 27 Saints defensive players, as well as at least one assistant coach — former defensive coordinator Gregg Williams — participated in the program.

“Our investigation began in early 2010 when allegations were first made that Saints players had targeted opposing players, including Kurt Warner of the Cardinals and Brett Favre of the Vikings,” NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said in the league’s press release. “Our security department interviewed numerous players and other individuals. At the time, those interviewed denied that any such program existed and the player that made the allegation retracted his earlier assertions. As a result, the allegations could not be proven. We recently received significant and credible new information and the investigation was re-opened during the latter part of the 2011 season.”

According to the league, the Saints’ program included payments for plays such as interceptions and fumble recoveries, but it also included “bounty” payments for “cart-offs” (opposing player was carried off the field) and “knockouts” (opposing player was not able to return to the game). Players would receive $1,000 for a “cart-off” and $1,500 for a “knockout” with payments doubling or tripling during the playoffs.

The funds of the pool were said to be $50,000 or more during the height of the Saints’ playoff run to the Super Bowl XLIV title after the 2009 season, according to the NFL’s findings.

Williams, now the defensive coordinator with the St. Louis Rams under head coach Jeff Fisher, former Competition Committee co-chairman and current committee member, faces the most serious allegations. According to the NFL, the bounty program was administered by Williams with the knowledge of other defensive coaches, and funds were contributed on occasion by Williams.

Minnesota Vikings Brett Favre is tackled by New Orleans Saints Bobby McCray (R) and Remi Ayodele (C), causing him to leave the field with an injury, during the fourth quarter of the NFL’s NFC Championship football game in New Orleans, Louisiana January 24, 2010. REUTERS/Brian Snyder (UNITED STATES – Tags: SPORT FOOTBALL)

The league found that Saints owner Tom Benson was not aware of the program. When he was told by the league earlier this year of the new information discovered, Benson told the NFL he had directed club GM Mickey Loomis to ensure the program was to be discontinued immediately. But the league found evidence that Loomis did not carry out Benson’s directions, and that Loomis denied knowledge of a bounty program in 2010, and he pledged he would ensure that no such program was in place. The NFL found no evidence that Loomis took any effective action to stop the practice.

Benson released a statement late Friday afternoon via the club’s website that said:

“I have been made aware of the NFL’s findings relative to the “Bounty Rule” and how it relates to our club. I have offered and the NFL has received our full cooperation in their investigation. While the findings may be troubling, we look forward to putting this behind us and winning more championships in the future for our fans.”

The NFL also found that head coach Sean Payton was not a direct participant in funding or administration of the program, he was aware of the allegations, did not make any inquiry into the facts, failed to stop the program and did not instruct his assistants or players that a bounty program was against league rules and could not continue.

The NFL’s bounty rule as summarized in the 2011 League Policies for Players (Synopsis) is:

Bounty Rule and Non-Contract Bonuses

  • Players cannot offer a bonus to teammates for their performance against a particular team or a particular opposing player or players.
  • Players cannot create “bonus” pools for special teams’ performance.
  • Players cannot offer or share playoff game compensation with teammates.
  • Players cannot make cash or non-cash awards to teammates for outstanding performances or achievements.
  • Violators may be subject to disciplinary action for conduct detrimental to the National Football League.
  • Gifts to teammates are permissible after the conclusion of the club’s playing season, provided that no offer, promise, or announcement of such a gift was made during the club’s playing season.

Goodell has been given the findings, and he will determine the penalties to both the Saints organization and the individuals involved. The penalties could include fines and suspensions and forfeiture of draft choices.

The NFL fined New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick the maximum $500,000 (the most ever against a coach in the league’s history), and the Patriots organization $250,000 and ordered the team to give up the club’s 2008 first-round draft choice (if it reached the playoffs in 2007) or second- and third-round picks (if they did not make the playoffs that season) after a defensive assistant was caught taping sideline signals in a September 2007 game against the rival New York Jets. The Patriots made the playoffs, and the first-round pick was forfeited.

The NFLPA released a statement late on Friday:

Health and safety is a paramount issue to the NFLPA. The NFLPA was informed of this investigation by the NFL earlier today and will review the information contained in the league’s report.

The full text of the league’s press release from NFL Communications follows:

A lengthy investigation by the NFL’s security department has disclosed that between 22 and 27 defensive players on the New Orleans Saints, as well as at least one assistant coach, maintained a “bounty” program funded primarily by players in violation of NFL rules during the 2009, 2010 and 2011 seasons, the NFL announced today.

The league’s investigation determined that this improper “Pay for Performance” program included “bounty” payments to players for inflicting injuries on opposing players that would result in them being removed from a game.

The findings – corroborated by multiple independent sources – have been presented to Commissioner Roger Goodell, who will determine the appropriate discipline for the violation.

“The payments here are particularly troubling because they involved not just payments for ‘performance,’ but also for injuring opposing players,” Commissioner Goodell said. “The bounty rule promotes two key elements of NFL football: player safety and competitive integrity.

“It is our responsibility to protect player safety and the integrity of our game, and this type of conduct will not be tolerated. We have made significant progress in changing the culture with respect to player safety and we are not going to relent. We have more work to do and we will do it.”

The players regularly contributed cash into a pool and received improper cash payments of two kinds from the pool based on their play in the previous week’s game. Payments were made for plays such as interceptions and fumble recoveries, but the program also included “bounty” payments for “cart-offs” (meaning that the opposing player was carried off the field) and “knockouts” (meaning that the opposing player was not able to return to the game).

The investigation showed that the total amount of funds in the pool may have reached $50,000 or more at its height during the 2009 playoffs. The program paid players $1,500 for a “knockout” and $1,000 for a “cart-off” with payouts doubling or tripling during the playoffs.

The investigation included the review of approximately 18,000 documents totaling more than 50,000 pages, interviews of a wide range of individuals and the use of outside forensic experts to verify the authenticity of key documents.

The NFL has a longstanding rule prohibiting “Non-Contract Bonuses.” Non-contract bonuses violate both the NFL Constitution and By-Laws and the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Clubs are advised every year of this rule in a memo from the commissioner. Citing Sections 9.1(C)(8), and 9.3(F) and (G) of the Constitution and By-Laws, the memo for the 2011 season stated:

“No bonus or award may directly or indirectly be offered, promised, announced, or paid to a player for his or his team’s performance against a particular team or opposing player or a particular group thereof. No bonuses or awards may be offered or paid for on field misconduct (for example, personal fouls to or injuries inflicted on opposing players).”

“Our investigation began in early 2010 when allegations were first made that Saints players had targeted opposing players, including Kurt Warner of the Cardinals and Brett Favre of the Vikings,” Commissioner Goodell said. “Our security department interviewed numerous players and other individuals. At the time, those interviewed denied that any such program existed and the player that made the allegation retracted his earlier assertions. As a result, the allegations could not be proven. We recently received significant and credible new information and the investigation was re-opened during the latter part of the 2011 season.”

The additional investigation established the following facts:

  1. During the 2009, 2010 and 2011 seasons, the players and other participants involved used their own money to fund a “Pay for Performance” program. Players earned cash awards for plays such as interceptions or fumble recoveries. They also earned “bounty” payments for “cart-offs” and “knockouts.” All such payments violate league rules for non-contract bonuses.
  2. Players were willing and enthusiastic participants in the program, contributing regularly and at times pledging large amounts. Between 22 and 27 defensive players contributed funds to the pool over the course of three NFL seasons. In some cases, the amounts pledged were both significant and directed against a specific opposing player.
  3. The bounty program was administered by defensive coordinator Gregg Williams with the knowledge of other defensive coaches. Funds were contributed on occasion by Williams.
  4. Saints owner Tom Benson gave immediate and full cooperation to the investigators. The evidence conclusively established that Mr. Benson was not aware of the bounty program. When informed earlier this year of the new information, Mr. Benson advised league staff that he had directed his general manager, Mickey Loomis, to ensure that any bounty program be discontinued immediately. The evidence showed that Mr. Loomis did not carry out Mr. Benson’s directions. Similarly, when the initial allegations were discussed with Mr. Loomis in 2010, he denied any knowledge of a bounty program and pledged that he would ensure that no such program was in place. There is no evidence that Mr. Loomis took any effective action to stop these practices.
  5. Although head coach Sean Payton was not a direct participant in the funding or administration of the program, he was aware of the allegations, did not make any detailed inquiry or otherwise seek to learn the facts, and failed to stop the bounty program. He never instructed his assistant coaches or players that a bounty program was improper and could not continue.
  6. There is no question that a bounty program violates long-standing league rules. Payments of this type – even for legitimate plays such as interceptions or fumble recoveries – are forbidden because they are inconsistent with the Collective Bargaining Agreement and well-accepted rules relating to NFL player contracts.

Commissioner Goodell has advised the Saints that he will hold further proceedings to determine the discipline to be assessed against individuals and the club. This will include conferring with the NFL Players Association and individual player leaders regarding appropriate discipline and remedial steps.

The discipline could include fines and suspensions and, in light of the competitive nature of the violation, forfeiture of draft choices. Any discipline may be appealed as provided for in the Constitution and By-Laws and Collective Bargaining Agreement. Any appeal would be heard and decided by the commissioner.

Commissioner Goodell also advised the Saints that he is retaining jurisdiction and reserving his authority to impose further discipline if additional information comes to his attention.

Share
This entry was posted in NFL and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.